the Successless Comics Blog

Powered by Newsprint

Tuesday, July 25, 2006

We suck. And other emotions of note.

Sorry about the blog inactivity. I had a birthday (27 is okay so far, thanks) and we had some movies to watch (yay Clerks II!). And let us not forget extreme measures taken to avoid unbelievably uncomfortable hot Seattle weather. You laugh, but 97 here is like 120 in other places.

During our brief sabbatical the interweb has been on fire with news and stories and photos of SDCC. The whole con seems very overwhelming to me - APE is so much more comfortable and at the pace and energy level I prefer. That being said there are several things that have made me extremely sad I did not attend and even drove me to the point of imagining what it would be like to be among the masses.

The first?
How come no one told me there was going to be a Lost panel? That is just mean and cruel and to be frank, fucked.



And if you've ever read this blog before you know we are both nerds for Scott Pilgrim. I cried a little bit inside hearing about O'Malley creating Sex Bob-Omb t-shirts. And then there was a photo posted to his Livejournal. And that made me want to punch the screen.



My last wish is to be able to see all the creators that never come to the west coast, unless it is for SDCC. Like Bryan Lee O'Malley or Brian Wood. But that isn't too painful to think about as there is a MoCCA trip in the works for next year.

The final bit of business is to have a patting-selves-on-back moment as I just noticed we've been blogging on this offset of Successless for a year. Not that it's our posts are all that unique, regular, or even fun to read. But either way, go us for tag-teaming the comics industry in a way only a boyfriend/girlfriend blog could.

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Forney hearts Led Zeppelin

Back in December when Dylan and I became official Seattlites, I picked up an issue of The Stranger, Seattle's alternative weekly paper. Within its inky pages was a small interest story about a local female comic artist marrying someone from my neighborhood co-op. It caught my attention mostly because of the illustration of the couple that the cartoonist did. It was fun and sassy while maintaing sincerity.

The style felt familiar to me, so I started going through my "inventory of cool things" (see: mental catalog of that which I give my stamp of approval to). I realized that I recognized her from a cartoon she did for my favorite magazine Bust. Even with this recollection of work I've seen of hers, I would have most likely forgotten to seek out her work if it weren't for her weekly feature in The Stranger: "Lustlab Ad of the Week". It is what it sounds like - you could be so lucky as to have the ever-talented Ellen Forney highlight to all Seattle whatever pervisities you put in your personal ad through her crafty cartoons.

Then one day while perusing the selection at Half-Priced Books I came across one of her offerings. It is called I Was Seven in '75, and I was instantly hooked. She was funny and smart and quirky and talented and someone I would love to drink beers with.

In our neighborhood of Capitol Hill it's hard to not see Ellen's pervasiveness...if you are looking anyway. Once familiar with the name, I saw her work popping up in the most random of places. I saw a postcard she did for a yoga studio while waiting in line at Caffe Vita. I saw her illustrations in The Stranger. I considered myself a fan for sure, but other than her website, there wasn't a whole lot to get my greedy little hands on.

Until now.

Enter I Love Led Zeppelin, brought to you by Kim Thompson and Gary Groth of Fantagraphics Books. For a mere $19.95 you can absorb everything from "How to be a successful call girl" to her enlightening stories of viriginity lost with Dan Savage, the best damn newspaper editor and sex columnist to call Seattle home. There is a lot more variety to her style than I previously thought, as evident through her work in "Wednesday Morning Yoga," and a lot of depth to her stories than a one panel illustration provides.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Monologues For the Coming Plague



Comics as a medium isn't very friendly to minimalism, and I have a feeling that a large reason for that is economic. Your typical "standard-size" pamphlet these days costs $2.99 for about 22 pages of story, and there are hundreds of them released every week. Readers like to feel like they're getting something for their three dollars, and they're likely to be disappointed if they can breeze through a comic in under 10 minutes. For that same three dollars, they could've rented a DVD at their local video store and had 2 hours of entertainment (more if it's a TV series on DVD). The minimalist precept that less is more doesn't have much sway over someone who feels their entertainment dollars are better spent on quantity.

There's definitely a tension between the concepts of quality and quantity at play when reading Monologues For the Coming Plague, the deceptively gargantuan new collection from Anders Nilsen, published by Fantagraphics Books. First impressions of the book are of a thick, perfect bound collection, similar in size and heft to an upscale paperback book with heavy matte covers. It's apparent without opening the book that there are two different paper stocks used; a blue-gray tinted stock that's unusually heavy, for roughly the first 4/5ths of the book, and a more typically weighted white stock for the last portion. It's a nice package, distinctive and eye-catching.

Artistically speaking, it's a triumph of content over form. If you've never seen Anders Nilsen's work before (the Dogs & Water graphic novel, his ongoing Big Questions series, and contributions to anthology series like Mome and Kramer's Ergot), it's likely to initially strike you as sloppy and amateurish. His drawing style is fluid, in the sense that it changes depending on the context of his work, and it should be no surprise that these sketchbook excerpts are rough and unrefined. In fact, they're visually reminiscent of something that would be doodled on a notepad during a phone call. Each "story," or monologue, or dialogue, presented here is paced at the brisk rate of one "panel" per page, often with a repeated visual surrounded by generous white space, with text providing the only variation. There are a handful of characters and scenarios, all equally absurd and introspective. Typically, there are either two characters having a conversation or otherwise addressing each other, or there is one character addressing the reader. It's a simple setup, and it's played out over and over again, with either extended interchanges, or a series of variations on one scenario. It's quite literally a page turner, at an average of 1-3 sentences per page, occasionally no text.

Nilsen uses this simple setup to great effect, however, with unexpected insights and sight gags popping up during repetitive sequences. The one-panel-per-page trick is actually an effective device for pacing out the stories, and allowing for surprises to hide behind a turned page. It allows a little more flexibility in the pacing than tiered panels would, where the "reveals" would have to be paced in multiples of the number of panels.

Some of the material here will be familiar from anthology appearances, notably some of the sequences with Nilsen's scribble-headed character, a cipher who plays strangely undefined roles in usually philosophical conversations. This character appears throughout the book, either talking with the vaguely drawn man from the cover, or talking directly to the reader. Here, he fills the roles of devil's advocate, secret conspirator, trickster, everyman, and more. There's also an extended gag-cartoon style setup, with a bird and an old woman with a bag of seeds saying surreal or unexpected things to each other. These scenes work on a simpler version of the central concept of Big Questions, using animals (specifically birds) as stand-ins for humans to allow us a more detached view of human nuance. While Big Questions tackles exactly what its title implies using this narrative device, the scenes here are more about quick jabs at human quirks.

It's strong material that takes advantage of its format, but the format itself may serve as an obstacle to many. Despite the high production value and quality content, it would be easy to see this book as padded, and overpriced. Despite its high page count, it's a quick read, with most pages containing no more words than a children's book. Combine that with an illustrative style that eschews craft in favor of roughly symbolic, almost iconic simplicity, and the overall impression to the general public is going to be somewhat skeptical. And at $18.95, that skepticism is going to be hard to overcome. A superficial evaluation of the book probably won't win over any potential readers. It's a prime case of conflict between art and economics; it's unlikely that the book would be as artistically successful in a different form, but it's the apparent conflict between form and content that may prevent it from getting the recognition it deserves.

Monday, July 03, 2006

Quiet Times in the Emerald City

Sorry things have been a bit quiet around here. Between moving, fighting this freakish heat here in Seattle, and figuring out how to mesh two comic collections into a one bedroom apartment, we've been a tad busy.

To bring our posts up to speed:

a. Superman: awesome. Kevin Spacey is a great Lex Luthor.
b. Scott Pilgrim and the Infinite Sadness: so. fucking. good. Just like we expected. Even if I am still waiting on my copy. A big fatty post on it will most likely appear later.
c. This week's ship list: is a thing of beauty. Flight #3, Babel #2, Pussey, and Monologues for the Coming Plague (I also have some catching up to do with Ellen Forney's I Love Led Zeppelin and Alison Bechdel's Fun Home).
d. Kevin Church: (aka BeaucoupKevin) sucks. He didn't buy me anything at MoCCA. I bought him stuff at APE. That being said, you should still congratulate him and Benjamin Birdie on being printed comic superstars with their debut in Boom Studios! X-Isle #1.


Okay, now that we are sort of caught up, I hope everyone has a nice 4th of July. In true insular blogger fashion, maybe we'll post drunk photos of us hanging out at my Uncle's house. Then again, maybe we won't.